What’s the Difference Between Fiction and Non-Fiction?

As a few writers have been handing creative non-fiction into my workshop lately, and I’m reading several of David Foster Wallace’s stunning essays, I’m thinking about the differences between good fiction and good non-fiction. What are the criteria for an effective piece? How different are the two media? Can a good work of non-fiction be turned into fiction, and vice versa? If you’re considering a foray into non-fiction, try keeping these guidelines in mind so that your story will fit into its best format.

1. Fiction has to make more sense.

You’ve heard the old adage “truth is stranger than fiction.” What that means is that while in real life coincidences and strange, random events occur all the time, in fiction they seem out of place. While real life is often chaotic and random, and you run in to your old kindergarten teacher on the street or someone gets hit by a bus without cause or reason, fiction has a greater sense of order. Fiction is often used to make sense of the things that happen to us. Non-fiction, too, must give us an argument or a story to follow, but it can have more leeway in this regard. An essay about the life of an individual, for example, can end with his senseless death.

2. Fiction needs more direction and purpose.

As noted in the previous point, fiction is often seeking to make sense of the random or chaotic way life seems to operate. It may conclude that we can’t make sense of the thing, but it will still make that conclusion in an orderly way. Non-fiction, on the other hand, can report on an event or a life in a more neutral way. It doesn’t have to recast events in a way that will better serve its thesis. It may sometimes, but it doesn’t have to.

3. Non-fiction amazes with the facts: fiction amazes with the story.

Another way non-fiction relies on different machinery is in how it actually entertains us. Both forms can have great writing and apt observations. However, non-fiction has our trust, and it can amaze us with the facts. If it tells us that something incredible happened, we are stunned because we know it really happened. If a piece of fiction just blurts out something incredible, we are unmoved; it’s made up. Fiction amazes us with story, by delighting us with how that incredible thing came about.

So if you have a great story to tell, consider carefully what form would suit it best. Do you want to alter and polish it, shape it to serve a story, or let the facts rest on their own? Do you want to include your own reflections, or disguise them in the voice of a character? Make sure your story is best-served by its form.

4 comments

  1. Mary Lou Wynegar says:

    I found this to be an excellent article that provoked me to really think deeply… In a world where many are our worst critics I can thoroughly understand why one would be afraid to tell their story in an non-fiction format verses fiction. Fiction is safer. To tell your story you open your self up to being ridiculed, judged, (why didn’t she do this, why didn’t she do that, and so on.) One has to be strong within themselves to know they can withstand the pressures that society may throw their way in knowing that they did the best they could at the time. And that is the whole point, and reason for sharing their story ~ so others may learn from their mistakes, or triumphs. A decision that would take much thought from the writer in preparation most definitely.

  2. Sajjad Amin Bangash says:

    The vivid difference that this article has drawn, is in fact carries great importance to the people who tend to identify the literal difference between fiction and non-fiction writer. To me, it has obviously enhanced my knowledge spectrum.

Leave a Reply